The Editorial Constitution.
This is the permanent editorial standard that governs how knowledge is created, reviewed, maintained, corrected, and presented across Holistic Health AI. Every herb, food, formula, condition, and every response from Hakim must pass through the principles and checklist below. Trust is not decoration — it is the standard every page must meet before it reaches you.
Our mission is education — not persuasion, not sensationalism, not marketing. Readers should leave every page better informed and better equipped to make thoughtful health decisions with qualified clinicians.
What our editorial review verifies
Every guide marked Editorial Review Complete has passed a structured internal quality review completed by Moji Tehrani, Founder, against the Editorial Constitution. The review verifies:
- Compliance with the Editorial Constitution
- Accurate representation of evidence
- Evidence grading
- Safety completeness
- Drug interaction coverage
- Communication of uncertainty
- Complete citations and sourcing
- Structural consistency
- Publication readiness
This is an internal quality review — not independent clinical review. As the Living Library grows, future independent professional reviews will be identified separately and explicitly.
The twelve principles
These principles hold regardless of future technology, AI models, avatars, or interface changes.
- 01
Truth Before Certainty
We never present uncertain information as established fact. When evidence is limited, conflicting, preliminary, or evolving, we say so clearly. Honesty is more valuable than confidence.
- 02
Separate Knowledge
Every guide clearly distinguishes Traditional Persian Medicine, Modern Scientific Evidence, Evidence Strength, Safety & Contraindications, and Hakim's Perspective. These are never blended.
- 03
Evidence Is Living
Every reviewed page displays Last Reviewed, Reviewer, Date Updated, Evidence Strength, and Sources Reviewed. Publication is the beginning of review, not the end.
- 04
Transparency Builds Trust
Who reviewed this, when, which sources were evaluated, evidence strength, and what remains uncertain — always easier to find than marketing.
- 05
Corrections Are Public
Mistakes will occur. We never hide them. We update the guide, record the correction, and preserve trust through transparency.
- 06
Evidence Hierarchy
Systematic Reviews → Meta-Analyses → Human Clinical Trials → High-quality Observational Research → Traditional Persian Medical Sources. Traditional knowledge is invaluable; it is never presented as equivalent to strong clinical evidence unless current research supports that.
- 07
No False Authority
We avoid cure, guaranteed, proven, miracle, always, never — and prefer may help, evidence suggests, traditionally used, early evidence indicates, more research is needed.
- 08
Safety First
Every guide includes, where appropriate: drug interactions, pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, allergies, contraindications, and red flags. Safety information is never difficult to find.
- 09
AI Supports Editorial Standards
Hakim teaches from reviewed knowledge and never invents evidence. If evidence is unavailable, uncertain, or conflicting, Hakim says so plainly.
- 10
Continuous Improvement
Every review improves accuracy, clarity, safety, citations, readability, and educational value — not simply page length.
- 11
Respect the Reader
Never overwhelm. Never use complexity to impress. Explain difficult ideas simply. Readers finish each guide understanding more than when they began.
- 12
AI and Human Partnership
AI accelerates research and education. Human editorial judgment remains responsible for accuracy, transparency, and final publication. Neither is infallible.
The Editorial Review Checklist
A guide may only receive the Reviewed designation after every item below has been verified. Guides that carry a review date but have not yet cleared the full checklist remain in editorial review and do not appear on /reviewed.
Accuracy
- Medical claims accurately reflect the cited evidence.
- Traditional Persian Medicine is clearly distinguished from modern scientific evidence.
- No unsupported claim is presented as established fact.
Evidence
- Evidence strength assigned.
- Major claims supported by appropriate citations.
- Sources categorised correctly.
- Uncertainty acknowledged where appropriate.
Safety
- Drug interactions reviewed.
- Pregnancy guidance included where appropriate.
- Breastfeeding guidance included where appropriate.
- Children guidance included where appropriate.
- Older-adult guidance included where appropriate.
- Contraindications documented.
- Red Flags documented.
Transparency
- Reviewer listed.
- Last Reviewed date displayed.
- Sources reviewed documented.
- Corrections incorporated.
- Editorial notes updated where necessary.
User experience
- Language understandable.
- No unnecessary jargon.
- Internal links verified.
- Related guides connected.
- Navigation functions correctly.
AI (Hakim)
- Hakim's explanations align with reviewed evidence.
- No unsupported recommendations.
- No contradictions between Hakim and the guide.
How we label evidence
Every claim in a HolisticHealthAI guide carries one of four honesty labels. If a claim cannot honestly carry one of these labels, it does not appear on the page.
- Strong
- Consistent findings across multiple high-quality studies or major clinical guidelines.
- Moderate
- Supported by good-quality studies, but with some open questions or mixed results.
- Emerging
- Promising early evidence — often small studies or a young field. Handle with humility.
- Traditional
- Knowledge held across generations of practice, often not fully tested by modern science.
The Final Editorial Test
Before publishing anything as Reviewed, our editors ask six questions. If the answer to any is not clearly yes, we continue improving before marking it.
- 1.Is this accurate?
- 2.Is the evidence honestly represented?
- 3.Is uncertainty clearly acknowledged?
- 4.Would we confidently sign our names to this?
- 5.Does this help the visitor make wiser health decisions?
- 6.Would we be proud if another physician, researcher, educator, or AI system cited this guide?
“Would I feel completely comfortable recommending this to my own parents?”
Education, not medical care
Everything on Holistic Health AI is educational. It is not a substitute for individualised medical care. For persistent symptoms, sudden changes, medication interactions, pregnancy, or a serious medical condition, please involve a qualified clinician who knows your history.
Editorial philosophy
- · Depth over volume. One trustworthy guide is worth ten shallow ones.
- · Honesty over marketing. We say what we know, what we don't, and where science is still unfolding.
- · Continuity over novelty. The same 100 cornerstone guides should still be trusted twenty years from now.
- · Respect for tradition. Persian wisdom is treated as a living practice, not a museum exhibit.
- · Practical care. Every article ends with something a reader can gently try today.
Scientific review process
- The guide is drafted from primary sources — clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, landmark trials, and respected textbooks.
- Every factual claim is checked against current peer-reviewed evidence and labelled by strength.
- Traditional Persian material is cross-checked against classical texts and contemporary scholarly translations.
- The editorial review is completed by the founder, verifying references, safety guidance, and evidence labels before publication.
- The Editorial Review Checklist is completed line by line. A guide that fails any item stays in review — it is not marked Editorial Review Complete.
- The guide is scheduled for review at least once every 12 months, or immediately when major evidence changes.
Persian traditional medicine — how we handle it
Persian medicine (Tebb-e Sonnati) is treated as a coherent, centuries-old system of observation and practice. We present its perspective on its own terms, alongside — never hidden inside — the modern scientific view. Where the two agree, we say so. Where they differ, we present both respectfully and let the reader decide.
Conflict of interest
We do not accept payment to feature products, brands, supplements, or clinics. We do not run affiliate links inside our cornerstone guides. Sponsors and advertisers have no influence over editorial content or evidence labels.
Corrections policy
When we get something wrong — a stale citation, a misread study, a broken reference — we correct it quickly, note the change in the article's version history, and thank the person who flagged it. You can report anything you see at /corrections.
Update schedule
Every cornerstone guide is reviewed at least once every 12 months. When a major clinical guideline, systematic review, randomised trial, safety alert, or regulatory change touches a topic, we prioritise the affected guide immediately and record the update in its version history.
How we handle uncertainty
If evidence is limited, we say so. If two good studies disagree, we say so. If a traditional teaching hasn't been tested in a modern trial, we say so. We would rather a reader trusts us with a small honest answer than lose them with a large confident one.
Why you can trust Hakim
- · Every guide marked Editorial Review Complete publishes its review date and next scheduled review.
- · Every article carries an evidence confidence label — Strong, Moderate, Emerging, or Traditional.
- · Every article shows its version history so you can see how it has improved over time.
- · Every article invites correction. We would rather be corrected than be wrong.
- · No advertorials, no affiliate pushing, no hidden sponsors inside cornerstone guides.
More on how we review
›Craftsmanship
The Craftsmanship Standard
Every page, held to the same quiet bar.
Hakim isn't finished until each page reads clearly on the first screen, cites its sources, distinguishes evidence from tradition, and leaves the reader more capable than before.
Cornerstone guides offer five depths. Pick the one that fits today.
The editorial checklist
Clear answer in the first screen
A reader should know the point before scrolling.
Practical takeaway
One thing they can do today.
Scientific evidence
What modern research actually shows.
Traditional Persian perspective
How the tradition frames the same question.
Areas of agreement
Where old wisdom and new science meet.
Areas of uncertainty
Where honest people still disagree.
Safety guidance
When to slow down or seek a clinician.
Related topics
The natural next question, already linked.
Companion recommendation
How Hakim would apply this to you.
References
Sources named and traceable.
Five reading modes
- 30 sec
Quick Answer
The single most useful sentence, then done.
- 5 min
5 Minute Guide
The essential shape — enough to act well today.
- 15 min
Complete Guide
The full picture, gently paced.
- 20 min
Scientific Review
The evidence, weighed and cited.
- 10 min
Persian Tradition
How Persian medicine has understood this for centuries.
How we name evidence
These categories never blur. Every claim is labeled honestly.
- Established evidence
Repeatedly demonstrated across strong studies.
- Moderate evidence
Supported by good studies, still maturing.
- Emerging evidence
Promising early findings; not yet settled.
- Traditional Persian
Long-standing practice; treated as heritage.
- Expert opinion
Reasoned judgment where trials are limited.
- Honestly unknown
We don't know — and we say so.
Signature Hakim visuals
Ten original illustrations that will become recognizable as Hakim.
- Healthy Aging Wheelplanned
- Inflammation Networkplanned
- Heart Protection Pathwayplanned
- Brain Health Mapplanned
- Sleep Cycleplanned
- Mizaj Wheelplanned
- Persian Herb Relationshipsplanned
- Seasonal Living Calendarplanned
- Longevity Pillarsplanned
- Food Relationship Mapsplanned
The Hakim Experience Test
Before a page ships, we ask:
- 1
Would someone bookmark this?
- 2
Would they recommend it to family?
- 3
Would they trust it?
- 4
Would a physician respect it?
- 5
Would an AI confidently reference it?
- 6
Would they return tomorrow?
If any answer is "no," we keep working.
›How recommendations are made
How a recommendation is made — end to end.
Nothing is opaque. Every recommendation follows the same seven-step path, and any step can be inspected.
- 1
Your profile
Age, life stage, mizaj (constitution), current health signals — held privately and used only to personalize.
- 2
Your goals
Sleep, energy, longevity, heart, brain, digestion, movement — what you actually want to feel.
- 3
Medical evidence
Trials, meta-analyses, and major guidelines. We weight evidence by design quality and independence.
- 4
Traditional Persian knowledge
Where centuries of observation align with modern findings — we lean in. Where they do not — we say so.
- 5
Risk assessment
Medications, pregnancy, chronic conditions, age. Anything with real risk earns a plain warning.
- 6
Personalized recommendation
A gentle, specific, do-today suggestion — never a diagnosis, never a prescription.
- 7
Hakim, Your Personal AI
Recommendations return as a soft daily practice — not a to-do list — so change accumulates naturally.
Hakim recommends. It never prescribes.
No recommendation replaces a physician, a diagnosis, or emergency care. Everything Hakim suggests is educational.
›How Hakim thinks
Traditional wisdom, modern evidence — held honestly side by side.
Hakim is neither a purely traditional voice nor a purely modern one. It brings five sources of understanding into every recommendation — and it is transparent about which one is doing the work.
Traditional Persian medicine
A thousand years of careful observation from Avicenna's Canon to modern Hakim practice. We treat this as inherited wisdom — never as proof — and preserve it with respect.
Modern nutrition
Peer-reviewed research on food, nutrients, and dietary patterns — including long-term cohort studies and randomized trials from reputable institutions.
Lifestyle medicine
Movement, sleep, stress, connection, purpose — the daily habits with the largest measured effect on healthspan.
Clinical evidence
Guidelines from AHA, ESC, WHO, and the Cochrane Collaboration. When guidelines disagree, we say so — and we say why.
Honest uncertainty
Where evidence is thin, contradictory, or evolving, Hakim says so plainly. We do not pretend to certainty that does not exist.
Our evidence levels
Every article carries a color-coded evidence badge so you always know what you are reading:
We separate what is known from what is believed, and we tell you which is which.
When we cite traditional Persian knowledge, we label it. When we cite modern research, we cite it. When something is genuinely uncertain, we say so — instead of guessing.
›Editorial team
One founder. One review process. In the open.
Hakim's content is drafted with AI assistance from primary sources and, where marked Editorial Review Complete, has passed our editorial review — an internal quality review completed by Moji Tehrani, Founder, against the Editorial Constitution. As the Living Library grows and independent professional reviewers — a registered dietitian, physician, or Persian traditional-medicine advisor — join the process, their names and credentials will appear here first, and on the guides they review.
Mission
To become the most trusted holistic wellness library on the internet — by respecting readers, respecting tradition, and respecting evidence.
Scientific integrity
Every claim is traceable to a source. Every source is dated. Every conclusion carries its evidence level.
Transparency
How we write, review, correct, and update is public — not hidden behind a corporate wall.
Continuous improvement
Guides are living documents. They get better every year, not stale.
We would rather publish less and be right, than publish more and be careless.
›Expert review
Expert review layer
Tradition and evidence, honestly separated.
On clinical topics, we never blur the line between a centuries-old Persian view and a contemporary clinical study. Readers deserve to see both — and to see where they agree, where they disagree, and where honest uncertainty remains.
- 01
Traditional Persian perspective
The classical view — from Avicenna's Canon, Razi, and generations of hakim practice — presented in its own right, not repackaged as folk wisdom.
- 02
Modern evidence
Systematic reviews, randomised trials, guideline statements. Tagged by evidence strength so readers can weigh confidence at a glance.
- 03
Areas of agreement
Where centuries of tradition and modern science quietly converge — often the strongest, most durable recommendations.
- 04
Areas of uncertainty
Where the two disagree, or where science has not yet caught up. Named honestly, never smoothed over.
- 05
When medical evaluation is appropriate
Every guide flags red-flag symptoms, medication interactions, and situations where a clinician — not an article — should lead.
›Why Hakim recommends
How Hakim Reasons
Nothing here should feel mysterious.
Every article, herb, food, journey, or personal suggestion Hakim offers can be traced back to six honest questions. If a recommendation can't answer them, Hakim would rather stay quiet.
Why this recommendation?
Because it fits the topic, evidence, and pattern of what you've explored.
Why now?
Because today's context — season, check-in, or reading history — makes it the most useful next step.
Why for me?
Because it reflects what you've shared, not a generic profile.
How strong is the evidence?
Every recommendation carries an evidence tier — Strong, Moderate, Emerging, Traditional, Consensus, or Historical.
What's uncertain?
We name what we don't yet know, and never hide it.
What are the alternatives?
You'll see what else Hakim considered, and why they were set aside for today.
The evidence tiers we use
Every factual claim carries one of these labels. They tell you exactly how much weight the evidence deserves — never more, never less.
Supported by multiple high-quality randomized trials or systematic reviews with consistent findings across populations.
Supported by good-quality observational studies or smaller trials. Direction is clear; magnitude may still be refined.
Supported by preliminary studies or mechanistic reasoning. Encouraging signal that has not yet been confirmed in large trials.
Rooted in centuries of Persian and classical medical practice. Presented as tradition, not as a substitute for clinical evidence.
Endorsed by major guideline bodies (WHO, AHA, USPSTF, NIH). Evidence may be indirect but expert agreement is high.
Included for historical or cultural context. Not a current clinical recommendation.